Manzoni: Dr. "Azzeccagarbugli"

Manzoni: Dr. "Azzeccagarbugli"
Picture by Francesco Gonin, 1840 edition of Alessandro Manzoni's "I promessi sposi"

lunedì 18 maggio 2009

Prof. Giorgio Resta's Lectures



LAW AND MUSIC:

"MOZART AT THE BAR:
The interplay between Legal Theory and Musical Interpretation"
Abstract
At a first look, law & music might appear as one of the most recent and less investigated frontiers of the law & literature movement. To some extent this is true. However, the interface between law and music has also been the subject of important studies in ancient times, in the middle age (one of the first examples is the anonymous treatise of the fourteenth century "Ars cantus mensurabilis mensurata per modus iuris") and during the twentieth century. Prominent legal scholars have written about musical estethics and musicology (f.i. Salvatore Pugliatti) and at the same time several important composers and musicians have had a legal training (among the others Carl Philipp Emmanuel Bach, Schumann, Stravinsky). The most important intersection between the two disciplines is represented by the theory of interpretation. Interpreting and performing a score raises a set of questions involves a range of problems not entirely different from interpreting a constitution, a statute, a regulation, or even a legal precedent. Lawyers have frequently confronted themselves with the theory of musical interpretation, in order to enhance their self-comprehension of the legal techniques of interpretation. Not by chance, we can find the same debates between originalists, intentionalists and contextualists in law and in music as well. In my lecture I will try to elaborate more on this subject, with the aid of a professional musician (M° Enrico Maria Polimanti) who will illustrate the most important intellectual trends and the practical problems of interpretation day by day faced by a musical performer. I will also approach the subject from a comparative perspective, looking at the different ways in which civil lawyers (Betti, Pugliatti) and common lawyers (Jerome Frank, Posner) have conceived the interaction between law and music.
Readings:
- J. Frank, "Words and Music", in 47 Columbia L. Rev. 1259 (1947).
- S. Levinson, J.M. Balkin, "Law, Music and other Performing Arts", in 139 U.Pa. L. Rev. 1597 (1991).
- T. Hall, "The Score as Contract", in 20 Cardozo L. Rev. 1589 (1999).
- J.M. Balkin, S. Levinson, "Interpreting Law and Music: Performance Notes on "The Banjo Serenader" and "The Lying Crowd of Jewes", 1999.
C.V. Prof. Giorgo Resta:
Giorgio Resta is an Associate Professor of Comparative Law at the University of Bari, Italy, where he teaches courses on private comparative law, contracts and intellectual property. He is author of three books and numerous articles on privacy, fundamental rights, contracts and torts in comparative perspective. He edited the Italian translation of Hesselink’s “New European Legal Culture”. His book “Autonomia privata e diritti della personalità” has been selected as one of the best legal books of year 2005 by the Italian “Club dei giuristi”. He is currently serving as member of the scientific board of the Legislative Committee for the reform of third book of Italian Civil Code, appointed by the Italian Ministry of Justice. He is member of the Italian Association of Comparative Law and editor of “Il diritto dell’informazione e dell’informatica” and “Rivista critica del diritto privato”. He received several scholarships from the Canadian Government (Faculty Research Program), the Max-Planck-Institut für Internationales und Ausländisches Privatrecht (Hamburg, Germany), the Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Patent-, Urheber- und Wettbewerbsrecht (Munich, Germany) and the Italian Research Council. He has been visiting scholar in the Yale Law School, the McGill Law School, the Law School of the University of Toronto, the Duke Law School, the Ludwig-Maximilians Universität (Munich, Germany), the Max-Planck-Institut für Internationales und Ausländisches Privatrecht (Hamburg, Germany). In 1995 he graduated with magna cum laude from the University of Rome “La Sapienza”. In 1999 he received his PHD in Private Law from the University of Pisa. He is member of the Italian bar. His principal academic interests are privacy, information property, media-law, contract and legal history.
C.V. M° Enrico Maria Polimanti, pianist:
Enrico Maria Polimanti studied piano and chamber music at the Conservatorio di Santa Cecilia. Awarded of the prestigious Foundation Scholarship of the Royal College of Music, he moved to London where he studied with Yonty Solomon. Once back in Italy he attended courses at Accademia Chigiana di Siena, at the Scuola Superiore Internazionale del Trio di Trieste. He also took part in numerous international master classes given by Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau, András Schiff. He won several prizes in Italy, among them: Hyperion chamber music competition 2001(first prize), Euterpe 2003 (first prize, also special prize “Duo Binetti”), “Pietro Argento” 2003 (first prize, also “Prize of the Critics”), Seghizzi International Song Competition 2004 (“Prize for best pianist”). He plays as soloist and in chamber ensembles for numerous Festivals and concert seasons in Italy and abroad, recently: Orchestre International de la Citè Universitaire in Paris, Primavera in musica agli Uffizi and Radio Vaticana. He regularly gives lessons, lectures and lecture-recitals in several schools and associations of Rome, at Università Roma3, St. Petersburg College-Florida and Federazione Italiana di Musicoterapia. He translated Charles Rosen’s book “Beethoven’s Piano Sonatas” (Astrolabio-Ubaldini, Roma) and recently he has written the essay The Earth has many keys. Emily Dickinson in the italian contemporary music (Mazzanti, Venezia). He took part in several radio, television and cd recordings (lately Rossini’s Petite Messe Solennelle for the label “Tactus”). His solo and chamber music repertoire covers a wide range of works dating from early eighteen century to the contemporary epoch.

21 commenti:

daniela ha detto...

Law and music….
If I didn’t attend this classes and someone asked me if there’s some links between this two disciplines, probably I thought that he was crazy!
Now I can say that the firs link that we can find is the interpretation of law and of music. Interpretation is not only reading something but read like at the mirror: the reading is influence by culture and society and development of them.
All of us can listen music, and decide if it’s more or less agreeable…with a subjective interpretation. But not all could decide if the performance is more or less correct. You must have a culture that represent your limits in which interpretation can be make in objective way. Like with law… all of us can watch movie or see a painting or read a sentence and tell if it like us, but not all of us can understand that is correct and what isn’t in these representation.
Is evident that music is less creative of what I think! In this one there’s rule that decide the compositor but the performer can change it into limits that he has, based on his music culture and music study. The subjective interpretation of law referring at the music could be the equity. When judge decide by equity he know the limits that must be respect but solve the problem whit is interpretation.
These are law in music and law as music point of view…and I think that both of them are contained in link between legal culture and music culture..I agree with prof. Resta when he said that “law is living culture”.
A particular thanks to M° Enrico Maria Polimanti for his performance…

Daniela D’Annibale

alessandra simeoni ha detto...

Hello!
Once again with the lecture of Law and Music, we reflected on the importance of interpretation for knowing and studying every kind of discipline.
It's incredible how our way of considering some topics, reading some written texts or listening to the music, can depends on the tools of interpretation we have in that period: have you ever considered the different meaning we are used to give to a film, a book or a song during the years of our life? The movie is the same, the written text too, but we have grown up and maybe we know something more about the topic or maybe another way of writing and shooting a film has spread in the society we're living in! As regard this aspect, today we learned how, during the 19th century, the Romantic way of thinking influenced the discovery of ancient music, as, during the same period, a new philology influenced the analysis of German law in Germany.

Thank you!

Alessandra Simeoni

Emanuela ha detto...

Today was an amazing lesson!I loved the way Prof Resta explained, so systematically the connection between law and music..None could never tought about it, at list in this way!The posibilities of the same interpreations of both, the diferents referementes,but the consciousness that those are, both, expressions of an enviroment and of a century!When I think about the connection between law and art I think that art can be an usefull instrument to understand law because is an expression of the reality that is ruled by the law.Reality is the object of both and the starting point at the same time!
I am curious about the lecture of tommorow!
BYE BYE!!
Emanuela Hernandez

Pierluigi ha detto...

Hi everybody!

Today in class we have talked about law and music: I don't hide from you that I was waiting for this lectures because, before today, I didn't think a relation between these matters...
The key to found a link between music and law is the interpretation (of music and of law) of a written text that comes from the past and the common themes are the type of interpretations: objective or subjective, textual or contextual, original or traditional... I agree for this with prof. Giorgio Resta, in fact a score have to been interpreted by a performer like also law have to been interpreted by a judge...

I don't think instead that a judge and a musician can be considered totally makes equal: legal interpretation is strict, hold the judge to a specific interpretation, also because the consequences of judge's activities are more serious! A musician, or better a performer, is more free to interpret a score: like we have seen in class in fact a score for an harpsichord can be easily adapted for a piano! Indeed a performer's interpretation can be even more free: piano, “crescente” or forte, adagio or allegro, with “risonanza” or not are choices of the artist to make more involving the performance respect to the audience. Not only: he can change, and often do it, his interpretation of the same piece also in order to audience's quality, in order to what performer wants to communicate to audience and also in order to his good or bad humor of the moment! Yes, in my opinion he can do it, because there is an identification between music and artist during a performance, and is just this aspect that consents to have a good result! And he can do it because it's true that art is also technique and has some rules that limit creations, but lets ample scopes of discretion!

A judge instead can't be influenced by anything, he is subject only to law (art.101 Cost.)! He can't be influenced by external or subjective aspects... at least I hope, well, it should be so!

See you tomorrow,
Pierluigi Oddone

Anonimo ha detto...

The free element (art. 548 c.p.p.) in the “trial's tempo”.

I would speak about the connection between law, particularly criminal procedure, and music.
At the beginning of the lesson, M° Polimanti played the Rameau's gavotte. He explained that in this piece Rameau didn't use the “tempo” indications. There are six variations, with different time divisions, but all of these parts must be played with the same methronomic tempo. After he played the piece of Debussy: most dynamic and passionate example of music, that tries to reproduce natural sounds, and uses several elements coming from Asian music.
So, in the first example there is a score without tempo indications, but this situation isn't unique. There are a lot of musicians and composers that don't use indications of dynamic, tempo or expression in their scores. The extreme example of this “free music writing” is represented by the contemporary music written by Luciano Berio, Steve Reich, John Cage. Musicians and composers that don't use the pentagram, but use graphic representations like squares, circles,points, lines, interpretable by percussive instruments. So a very strange and unique way of music, that is very minimalistic.
In this music is quite important the musician's interpretation, because he doesn't have many ties. He's really free in his performance, but not completely free! He can use his creativity, but he must use it in a reasonable way, without arbitrary interpretation.
In law we have a lot of example about “free rules”. And in these situations, the lawyer must use the same approach used by the musician. Especially in law, the “performer” can't use is arbitrariness. In European law there are a lot of “non-self” executing rules that compose a “soft – law order”. But the lawyer must discover and analyze the reasons, the ratio, and the causes of these rules. As the musician must interpret the music by a careful and philological approach. But in our law, the reality sometime is an other. For example, in the Criminal Procedure Code, there is the article 548, which represent an important point of observation in our discussion. The art. 544 c.p.p. establishes that after the writing of the “dispositivo”, the judge must write the motivation - “motivi di fatto e di diritto”- immediately. If isn't possible to write the motivation at the same time, the judge must write it within 15 days (2° comma) . If the motivation is difficult because there are more accused or the case is very heavy, he can write the motivation after 15 days, but not after 90 days ( 3° comma). But the art. 548 c.p.p., 2° comma, establishes an other and indefinite term: the judge, if can't respect the terms indicated by the art. 544 c.p.p., could write the motivation in the time he wants, and he must only deposit the judgment and he must advice the parts, the lawyers, and attorney about this deposition.
So a rule that we could compare with the “crown” - corona - used by composer: when a note is under this symbol, this note could be played in a long time. Often this symbol is used at the end of music piece. But the music performer can't play this sound “for ever”. He must be reasonable, because if he plays the note in a long time, “the listeners could be bored”! So despite this “free element” of tempo's interpretation, the musician must use is balance and is reason.
In the same way, the judge using the art. 548 c.p.p., must use the “trial's tempo” very carefully, and so he should deposits the motivation within a reasonable time. But sometimes musician are more reasonable than judge, because we have examples of judgment's motivations deposited after five years!

The relationship between law and music is very difficult and uneasy. But sometimes some categories of music interpretation, we could be very useful in law!
Good Night!
Giuseppe Cacciotti

Giorgia.c ha detto...

Hello!

These last two lessons were really interesting .... I played the piano for eight years and listen the pianist Enrico Polimanti was very exciting!
I want describe the steps, for me, more important of the lessons that began with the execution dell'Overture by Jean Philippe Rameau (Gavotte avec six doubles, from "Les nouvelles suites de pieces de clovecin, ou livre second).
Rameau doesn't indicate in melody the kind of tempo (es. adagio, andante, allegro ...) and leaves space for interpretation; although we must consider that some instruments leave more space for interpretation and other less like the harpsichord.
Between the musician and the judge the relationship is the interpretation but it is made in different areas.
Talking about the relationship between law and music, I initially thought it impossible and didn't understand what could be the interaction ...
Prof. Resta told us that interpretation and performance are different things; interpret means to understand the meaning of the text ( objective vs. subjective) considering also the context that influenced the text (contextualism and textualism).
Competing views on legal interpretation: Court Cost. sent.348/2007 "the rules of CEDU living in the interpretation that about their is given by the European Court"; and Justice A. Scalia: one would have to be an idiot to belive in a " Living Constitution".
Both law and music require transforming the written page into a performance.
In Debussy(1862-1918)," reflets dans l'eau" there is an Eastern influence,as explained by Polimanti before playing,and Debussy writes "free tempo"; he wants freedom in his performans and keep the right pedal of the piano pressed for long time to give a striking atmosphere.
Even in these lessons as those of law and cinema, we talked about three types of approach: law in music (Mozart's "Don Giovanni", "Le nozze di Figaro"), law as music (interpretation) and legal culture and musical culture (the culture of a particular historical period influences the iterpretation).
Igor Stravinsky pretended a scrupolous fidelity of a text.....but is fidelity possible??...we know that any legal provision-employing language-may be ambiguous,similary,any score is structurally incomplete and vague: pitch, tempo, dynamics....Es. Brahms, Ballad op.10 n 2(double movement).
Important reference to Erik Satie (1886-1925) who wrote: "to anyone forbid to read aloud the text during the performance of music".
Really interesting lesson!

Bye..

Giorgia Ciucci

astrid F. ha detto...

I really want to thank Prof.Resta for his lecture, after studying law&architecture I thought there could be no more connections with other arts..I was wrong!!! Law&music gave me a particular approach to music's world that I could'nt even imagine how it really was..The course is at its end, but I am sure that if we had much more time we could have studied something even more surprising : law&dance!!!! :)
thank you all, wish you the best.

Andrea ha detto...

Hi everybody!

The last week of this course has been very...strange! I'am nearby the end of my studies in law, and I've never seen a piano in a classroom, used to have a lecture!

Apart from this, the connection between law and music is a very particular point of view of those two disciplines. I know music very well, because I played the piano when I was a child, for a period of two, or three years (I don't remember it very well), and now I play drums, for seven years (what a radical change!).
The link between law and music is simple, but not direct. I think that an interpreter of a music score is like an interpreter of a code, or a constitution. But, in my opinion, there is a very important difference between those two interpreters: in music, the mysticism, the inspiration, the subjectivity are dominant characters; in law, every interpreter must approach a text with a lot of objectivity and a lot of reality, without any kind of mysticism, or something like this.
But I think that this is the one and only difference between those two figures of interpretation. So, the link, even in this case, is very strong.

During this course we have had the evidences that law is not something unic and withouth connections with other disciplines or studies. I think that this is the best instruction received during those fascinating lectures.
Last but not least, the two lectures about law and music are the final proof of a link of the law with every possible kind of art!

See you at the exam!

Andrea Severini

valentina ha detto...

Hi all!

I really like those lessons about law and music...it was awesome to have a piano in class.

In the beginning I thought that the connection between law and music was forced but I changed my mind when I listened to the topic in class.

I think that the talk about interpretation was really interesting and in my opinion is possible to see a ralationship between music interpretation and law interpretation.

I didn't agree with the speech about the correction to music paper, because I think that is important to respect what the author had in his mind and soul.

It was interesting also the change in music perception during the time and I think that also the way people look to law at changes.

Bye.

V. Russotto

Vanessa ha detto...

Hi everybody,

This week we told about law and iconography, and law and music.

Law and iconography is the study of imagine, symbols and artistic expressions.
In particular we saw a part of artistic expressions closely related to legal archeology, including “the code of Hammurabi”. It is a black stone found in Iraq, where laws are transcribed for the first time.
Some scholars think that it’s possible to understand the law through the study of artistic and to understand the artistic creation by knowledge of law.
Besides the legal system can be object of an allegoric representation, indeed the justice is one of four cardinal virtues; we may discover law in any work of art, even in a portrait.

Law and music is a controversial link.
According to Holmes (American judge) the law is not the place for the artist or poet; while Flaubert (writer, he was writing to faculty of law, never finished) thinks that every lawyer carries within himself the debris of a poet.
In particular we analyzed
Jean-Philippe Rameau, which was an important composer and musician and he was a theorist of musical interpretation.
According to him there is a kind of interpretation in every piece, and he tries to understand music essence and he considers art as freedom, he thinks that interpretation is an enrichment of the meaning of a text. While Valéry thinks that art is technique, rules and not only freedom, and interpretation is a mechanical activity.
Besides we told about Frank’s vision: the lawyer is a musician, the legislature is like a composer. It cannot help itself. It must leave interpretation to others, principally to court. The music is not mechanical, the interpreter decides freely the tempo.

bye-bye

Vanessa Malizia

Pierluigi ha detto...
Questo commento è stato eliminato dall'autore.
Pierluigi ha detto...

Just an example of Law In Music: "Un Giudice" is a song of Fabrizio De André from the album "Non al denaro, non all'amore né al cielo", 1971, breathed in Spoon River Anthology (musical arrangement by Nicola Piovani).
In this song De André talks about a midget who was scoffed by everybody for his condition. When then he becomes judge he gets back at his unhappiness thanks to his legal authority.
But at the end of his life he must to kneel down “non conoscendo affatto la statura di Dio” (not knowing God's height). Link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zHHoKM1JeQ

See you on Monday,
Pierluigi Oddone

Andrea ha detto...

Hi everybody!

Law and music...well, I found the link between law and music quite less direct than the other ones we faced during this course.
Anyway last two lesson were very interesting and I'd like to thank master Polimanti for his amazing plays, expecially the Rameau one.
I think that there are some similirarities between law and music, of course: both music are influenced by historical period, society, geographical area and so on.
Both of them are supposed to be interpretated. But Music interpreters have much more freedom that law interpreters(above all judges) have.
For exaple, you can add some instrument to the piece, or adapt it to your own purposes or to the special audience.
I hope that dosen't happen so often in jucials opinions! (Even the interpretation is "living law/music")
Moreover, I think that in our days the fracture between law and music became biggest than few centuries before.
For example, as far as 19th Century, both music and law were something that come from the "heart" of the society. I'd like to mention Pandettistica, that thought that law came from the "volk", as a popular feeling.
Now it's totally different: law is free from any social and cultural instance, only tries to describe reality as a economic phenomenon. But music too.
Music just tries to satisfy people's taste without sending any message.
That was foretold by a beautiful poem of Charles Baudelaire (for poetry of course but it could be adapted to whole cultural world) called "Perdita d'Aureola".

Bye!
See you at the exam!

Andrea Marangoni

Enrico ha detto...

Hi everybody,

I found the Prof. Resta lessons about "Law and Music" very interesting. It was struck me is the musical interpretation meaning and how it is linked with the law interpretation. I think that the debate about the way of understanding music interpretation (as creative or only as a mechanical procedure) could be used in the legal branch. The judge, or who interprets the law, made a simple extrapolation procedure of a content that is already in the text, or rather participates in the legal creation? This problem is not easy. I think I can agree, with that strand, how Prof. Resta said during the lesson, for which the law has not objective meaning, because it always requires the interpretation task: the interpreter uses its cultural background to found the real sense of the legal text. Similarly in music, the score is not the song, but the song exists only if expressed in sound. The law itself is not right: is not enough that it is written, the law is really right only if it has a social function, when he joined the common feeling, otherwise it is not respected and with time is no more applied, until finally it die.

Enrico Veri

Stefania Gialdroni ha detto...

Hi everybody! Just a piece of information: law and dance apparently exists but we didn't dare. Maybe next year...

Unknown ha detto...

Law and Music
Hi everybody!
First of all I want to congratulate with M. Polimanti for his very exciting performances during the lessons! Also I found very interesting the discussion of Prof.Resta. I share the importance of arts for a lawyer, in the way he can learn to think in a legal prospective also thanks to music, literature, cinema and not only looking at economics, statistics and other more scientific subjects and it ‘s supported by the fact that some law’s professors created legal theories also looking at the music.
Moreover the interpretation of a musical piece is very similar to the interpretation of a legal text: in both you have to create something ( a judge sometimes creates new rules in his sentences while he works on interpretation). The right and the music don’t exist without interpretation even if there are some differences. In music there isn’t only an intellectual activity but also a performance and it’s conditioned by the public, the instrument, the place in which the performer play. Thinking about a performance in law is more difficult, it could be when a lawyer has to explain his theory in front of the judge and in front of the other present people. In music the performer feels and lets feel to the public and for me it’s a peculiarity of arts not easy to find in law. Also the historical culture have an important rule in music and in law: they are conditioned by historical back ground.

Bye Bye

Giorgia Melia

Enrico ha detto...
Questo commento è stato eliminato dall'autore.
Enrico ha detto...

Hi!

Another important topic of discussion among those mentioned during the “law & music” lessons is the relationship between composer and performer. This topic struck me particularly because I believe that between composer and performer exists essentially the same relationship that exists between legislator and interpreter in the field of law. The composer is who composed the song, who wrote the score; the performer is the one who plays that song, he interprets this song, possibly using his cultural background. Similarly, the lawmaker in the field of law is the one who writes the laws, the interpreter is the one who basically using his background to discover the objective meaning of these laws in order to allow their application in the social world. Just as the figure of the composer and performer are both necessary for the success of the song, just as in the legal branch the lawmaker can not create real law without the interpreter; that because they both contribute to the success of the legislative text. A not applicable law is not a real law, it doesn’t exists; in the same way a song written on a score is not a song unless it is expressed in sound. In this sense I believe that composer and performer, are needed in the field of music, at least as lawmaker and interpreter in the legal field and between these figures there is a very similar relationship.

Ps: M°Polimanti was great!


Enrico Veri

Maria ha detto...

Law and music
I found really interesting the relationship between law and music, and it was really a great experience to hear the performance of Mr Enrico Maria Polimanti, it’s quite strange to find a piano in our class! I liked specially one thing of this relationship between law and music: the text and the performance! We all know that the music it’s not only played but it’s also written, when you play a track it’s just like you are reading a book aloud and the really great thing of the music is that even if you read always the same story every performer can give you a different way of that story! Mozart is not always the same even if his tracks are always the same! I found this connection between the law and music! Even if the law is the some beyond everybody we can see the law from different point of view, that’s what the lawyers do, the play the law, the same law and the music can seem always the same but in reality it changes, it changes because the persons are not the same, because the defendant but the “sin” it’s always the same! To play the law it’s not always a great music but when it works, when the performer are really good, well I think that we can hear the voice of the justice!

Maria Buonanno

Federica ha detto...

…Law and Music...
First of all seem me rightful to thank the Prof.Resta and the Prof.Polimanti to have offered us the opportunity to follow their overwhelming lessons, mine was not me happened before now to see a piano in a faculty of jurisprudence,it’s fantastic!
I think that these two words are very more neighbors than can think.
In reality at first sight it seems difficult to find something that unites the music to the right.The first one represents all of this that is imagination, harmony, lightness, creativeness, emotion;the second one according to of fanciful and of light it seems to have well little, surely each of us when think about the law we imagine something of very rigorous and authoritarian.
In reality if we look a little anymore lunge, this binomial introduces different common aspects, first among everything for what it pertains to the interpretation.
In fact as the musician it is interpreter of the notes, of the rhythms, of the times (just as the teacher Polimanti dearly has shown us) so the jurist, or the judge is better interpreter of the norm of law.
You are enough to look at our civil code to become himself account of the importance that is given to the interpretation.
Interpretation that can concern the law in ampler sense (es.art.12 of the dispositions on the law in general “Nell’applicare la legge non si può ad essa attribuire altro senso che quello fatto palese dal significato proprio delle parole secondo la connessione di esse,e dalla intenzione del legislatore.Se una controversia non può essere decisa con una precisa disposizione,si ha riguardo alle disposizioni che regolano casi simili o materie analoghe;se il caso imane ancora dubbio,si decide secondo i principi generali dell’ordinamento giuridico dello Stato”); the interpretation that can make reference instead to the discipline of the contracts,maybe”agree”is better, (es.CAP.IV.art.1362-1371 “Nell’interpretare il contratto si deve indagare quale sia stata la comune intenzione delle parti e non limitarsi al senso letterale delle parole.Per determinare la comune intenzione delle parti si deve valutare il loro comportamento complessivo anche posteriore alla conclusione del contratto.”etc etc.)
In a certain sense we can say that the code (for the jurist of civil law) is as divided(“SPARTITO”) him for the musician.
Besides following it same approach also used with "law and literature "and "law and cinema" (--- > law in music;law on music etc etc...)we can see how especially in the last decades the right also has devoured the world of the music (v. straight of author,or copyright…) above all to the Community level.
The respect is be liked to speak of a song written by one of the greatest singer songwriters that Italy has known, Fabrizio De Andrè, "A judge"; but my colleague Pierluigi has preceded me therefore I cannot add very other.
De Andrè in almost all his texts is expressed through metaphors, in fact many love him
but few understand really the meaning of its passages, has been a very enigmatic singer songwriter that has been able to paint different social figures of his and our times with an actuality that is almost disarming with its melodies.

See u soon.
Federica Meglio

riccardo ha detto...

Hi,
with the professor Resta and mr. Polimanti we analyzed law and music. As some of my collegues underlined at the beginning this relationship is hazarded, and I think the same. Than, with the help of the professor Resta I understood that these two words are not so different. First of all, thanks to the explanation about the common themes that they have: for example Mr.Polimanti let us notice that in both of them, the interpretation is really important. In fact, as an ancient book of law must be interpreted to be adapted to the modern days, it s the same for a musical composition in which the interpretation given by the artist is fundamental. By a different interpretation it s possible to rich a different result. Also in the relationship between law and music we noticed how there isn’t only one point of view.
There are three different approches:
- Law in music
- Law as music
- Legal culture and musical culture
Very interesting has been the speech about Salvatore Pugliatti ( he is an important lawyer man and a musical expert) . His considerations are based on four fundamental points:
- Critique to the mechanical model of interpretation
- The meaning of a musical text cannot be simply found (ingenuous realism)
- Legal interpretation and musical interpretation as complex activities
- Interpretation is always creation
We focused on the literary interpretation and we saw how the legislature is like a composer and how in both cases the legislature can guide to grotesque caricatures.

P.S.: Sorry if i'm late to post this comment

Riccardo Varano